Book Review: Lord of the Flies

In William Golding’s allegory, Lord of the Flies, he tries to prove the point that humans are bad, and need to learn how to be good. This book was written soon after World War 2, so it makes sense that he believes this. He does a very good job of proving his point with the characters for example.
The first character I will be talking about is Ralph. In the beginning of the story Ralph is happy that there are no adults on the island, and he messes around. Eventually, Ralph is elected leader by the other kids on the island. He is a good leader, and he is the primary representation of order, civilization, and productive leadership.
The other character I want to talk about is Jack. Jack wants to be leader as well, but gets out voted by Ralph. Although Jack isn’t the primary leader of the boys, he gets to be leader of the hunt. On a hunt he has an opportunity to kill a baby pig, but he decides not to. After this he started only caring about killing this pig and Ralph was sick and tired of it. Jack even decides to break off from the group to start his own. Almost everybody joins Jack, but Jack was a terrible leader. He only cared about having fun, not about survival. Jack represents the chaos in people.
Overall, William Golding does a very good job using this book as an allegory. The characters are very well written to fit the ideas he was going for. My favorite is Jack, because of his development throughout the entire book. Although Jack is the antagonist of the story, I still like how he represents the craziness in the world.